Again, Now to consider the point made by Massimo: At 15:07 +0100 07/11/2002, Massimo Marchiori wrote: >1) [major] when transporting/manipulating RDF, you risk to lose the >import information. This can occur if you consider that once you've imported the definition of someURI#Foo, you are entitled to call it "Foo" in your RDF/OWL. Is this the issue? Would someone be opposed to have an "import" construct + the obligation to keep the someURI# ? This should solve this problem at least. Import would just mark the endorsement of the imported content. -- Jérôme Euzenat __ / /\ INRIA Rhône-Alpes, _/ _ _ _ _ _ /_) | ` / ) | \ \ /_) 655, avenue de l'Europe, (___/___(_/_/ / /_(_________________ Montbonnot St Martin, / http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo 38334 Saint-Ismier cedex, / Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr France____________________/ Jerome.Euzenat@free.frReceived on Thursday, 7 November 2002 11:55:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:37 UTC