Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1

>spot-checking, I notice this one is missing a # in
Oh yes.

>Also, do the tests need to rely on xml:base?
I think there is extra clarity in doing so.

I've tried modifying one of the tests to not so, and we can compare.
This one also doesn't 404.

Notice I have left xml:base declarations in, except that they are now
innocuous. It permits the files to be copied easily.

I am eager to avoid absolute URIs except in xmlns and xml:base declarations.
I find the length very cluttering. The short relative URIs look OK to me
though ...



Received on Sunday, 28 July 2002 04:04:12 UTC