- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 27 Jul 2002 10:07:06 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 22:49, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > The links should now work. > > i.e. > The test files are: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I3.4/bad001.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I4.1/bad001.rdf > > showing the deprecated names, and > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises001.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/conclusions001.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises002.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/conclusions002.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises003.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/conclusions003.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises001.rdf spot-checking, I notice this one is missing a # in xmlns:this="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/test001" Also, do the tests need to rely on xml:base? And please let's use the example domain if we're gonna have namespace names that 404. > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/conclusions001.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises002.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/conclusions002.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises003.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/conclusions003.rdf > > showing the basic meaning of the terms. > > Jeremy -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you in Montreal in August at Extreme Markup 2002?
Received on Saturday, 27 July 2002 11:07:52 UTC