Re: new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects

> I find the OWL synonyms quite useful. It eases the burden of users on
> keeping straight which names come from where.

well, rdfs:subPropertyOf comes from
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> no?

> It's just plain silly that
> Property is the rdf namespace but Class is in the rdfs namespace.

maybe silly, but still OK

[...]

I don't need that kind of synonyms

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Saturday, 27 July 2002 07:24:03 UTC