Re: Appendix C. http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl

On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 19:35, Deborah McGuinness wrote:
> great thx.
> is that url the official one now for the owl namespace (i.e., can i point to it from my
> document)?

yes.

> thx,
> d
> 
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> > Mike, Peter,
> >
> > Mike, I took a copy of
> >   http://www.daml.org/2002/06/webont/owl.owl
> > as of
> >   $Revision: 1.9 $ of $Date: 2002/07/18 19:29:44 $
> >
> > and put it at
> >
> >   http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
> >
> > This discharges my action about the namespace
> > name, by the way.
> >
> > Peter, you took an action last week to review
> > it, I gather. Any news?
> >
> > I tried feeding it to our tools, but
> > they haven't been updated to grok
> > parseType="Collection" yet. Ah... that was easy...
> > yes, looks good.
> >
> > Due to our open issue about media types...
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.13-Internet-Media-Type-for-OWL
> >
> > I wasn't sure what media type to use; I
> > used text/plain for now.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you in Montreal in August at Extreme Markup 2002?

Received on Thursday, 25 July 2002 13:40:31 UTC