Re: new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects

> I suggest it subsumes the suggestion from Mike Dean about
>   TITLE:  owl:Class still needed
> of 17 Jul 2002 20:08:13 -0400

Not if owl:Class is a subclass of rdfs:Class, which it
currently is (taken from daml:Class).

If we determine that sameClassAs can be used, then I agree.

	Mike

Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 15:04:46 UTC