- From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:04:13 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> I suggest it subsumes the suggestion from Mike Dean about > TITLE: owl:Class still needed > of 17 Jul 2002 20:08:13 -0400 Not if owl:Class is a subclass of rdfs:Class, which it currently is (taken from daml:Class). If we determine that sameClassAs can be used, then I agree. Mike
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 15:04:46 UTC