- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:53:13 -0400
- To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Cc: mdean@bbn.com, www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com> Subject: Re: OWL Reference Description for F2F 3 Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 01:00:55 +0200 > > The reference description is also missing entries for > > owl:List > > owl:first > > owl:rest > > owl:nil > > in the list of language elements. > > > > As well, the expansion of the collection should use owl: for these > > resources. > > A while ago RDFCore proposed those to be > rdf:List > rdf:first > rdf:rest > rdf:nil > where @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . > That was in message > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jun/0003.html > > -- , > Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ It would be useful if the RDF Syntax working draft was updated to completely reflect this decision. As of now, only about half of the necessary changes are in there. I also don't believe that the necessary changes have been made to the RDF MT document. Perhaps this would be a good point to include in this week's telecon, as it sure would be nice to be able to remove the section on collections from the reference description and instead point to RDF Core WG documents, even if only drafts. peter
Received on Monday, 15 July 2002 19:53:30 UTC