- From: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:43:28 -0400
- To: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
All, At the telecon today (July 11), I was made owner of this issue. What we discussed in the telecon was actually issue 4.1 - that "unique" and "unambiguous" are bad names (and what they mean). Issue 3.4 is that daml:unambiguousProperty is not included in OWL. There appears to have been consensus to resolve this issue as follows: Although UnambiguousProperty can be expressed in a variety of ways by combining other language features (one way is to use UniqueProperty and inverse), it is a useful feature and should be in OWL, most likely under a different name - see issue 4.1. -Chris Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group IBM T.J. Watson Research Center PO Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA +1-914-784-7055 Fax: +1-914-784-6078
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 20:44:03 UTC