- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:01:46 -0500 (EST)
- To: jjc@hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
That is currently missing. I will add a production like Ontology(<directive> ...) # rdf:type owl:Ontology . peter PS: By the way, how DO you refer to the current URI in an N-triple? From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com> Subject: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:06:26 +0100 > > > Peter, > > can you point me at text that explains how the metadata stuff (including > > <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""/> > > ) is included in the abstract syntax. > > I want to check that I am right in thinking that the following two files are > in OWL Lite: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-A.rdf > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-B.rdf > > hmmm, > > they are not are they? > > They don't say that the classes are subclasses of owl:Thing and hence they > cannot be the image of the mapping rules. Right. > Jeremy peter
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 08:01:56 UTC