Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite

On December 11, Jim Hendler writes:


> Question - I may be misunderstanding some of the OWL semantics, but 
> if I say that something is restricted to be an owl:oneOf (which is in 
> Lite), and then only give the list a single element - isn't that the 
> same as doing a hasValue?  If we can already do that in Lite, why 
> adding hasValue be worse?

If you care to look in the feature synopsis you will find:

2.2 OWL Synopsis
The expanded summary listing of OWL adds the following:
2.2.1 OWL Class Axioms Synopsis

    * oneOf (enumerated classes)

I.e., oneOf is *not* in OWL Lite.



> -- 
> Professor James Hendler
> Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
> Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
> Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)

Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2002 16:26:59 UTC