- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:00:20 +0000
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
My understanding of the abstract syntax is that the following RDF Graph is not part of OWL DL. <a> <b> _:v . <a> <c> _:v . _:v <d> <e> . i.e. the use of blank nodes in OWL DL is approximately that permitted in RDF M&S without the new rdf:nodeID construct. I think this is a mistake. RDF Core found that the inability to serialize an arbitrary graph in the official syntax was somewhat embarrassing, I think WebOnt should learn from that embarrassment. Suggested fix, permit individualID,and perhaps classID to be a blank node identifier in abstract syntax. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2002 14:00:30 UTC