- From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:39:14 -0800
- To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
- cc: WebOnt <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jeff, This looks good. A few comments: > priorVersion > backCompatibleWith > incompatibleWith > deprecatedClass > deprecatedProperty These should be DeprecatedClass and DeprecatedProperty, consistent with the later usage. If we're spelling things out, I'd prefer backwardCompatibleWith. > In addition, we will remove the following identifier from the OWL namespace. > > versionInfo I'm opposed to this. I've found daml:versionInfo (e.g. with CVS identifiers) very helpful for configuration management and debugging, and I don't think it conflicts with the newer constructs. > <owl:backCompatWith rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/vehicle-1.0"> should be backCompatibleWith (or backwardCompatibleWith) > <!-- assume Automobile is now the preferred term for Car --> It would be good to capture this in the graph, e.g. <owl:DeprecatedClass rdf:ID="Car"> <rdfs:comment>Automobile is now preferred</rdfs:comment> </owl:DeprecatedClass> > <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="DeprecatedClass"> > <rdfs:subClassOf resource="Class" /> > </rdfs:Class> should be rdf:resource="#Class" > <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="DeprecatedProperty"> > <rdfs:subClassOf resource="Property" /> > </rdfs:Class> should be rdf:resource="&rdf;Property" Thanks! Mike
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 13:40:30 UTC