- From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:39:14 -0800
- To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
- cc: WebOnt <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jeff,
This looks good. A few comments:
> priorVersion
> backCompatibleWith
> incompatibleWith
> deprecatedClass
> deprecatedProperty
These should be DeprecatedClass and DeprecatedProperty,
consistent with the later usage. If we're spelling things
out, I'd prefer backwardCompatibleWith.
> In addition, we will remove the following identifier from the OWL namespace.
>
> versionInfo
I'm opposed to this. I've found daml:versionInfo (e.g.
with CVS identifiers) very helpful for configuration
management and debugging, and I don't think it conflicts
with the newer constructs.
> <owl:backCompatWith rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/vehicle-1.0">
should be backCompatibleWith (or backwardCompatibleWith)
> <!-- assume Automobile is now the preferred term for Car -->
It would be good to capture this in the graph, e.g.
<owl:DeprecatedClass rdf:ID="Car">
<rdfs:comment>Automobile is now preferred</rdfs:comment>
</owl:DeprecatedClass>
> <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="DeprecatedClass">
> <rdfs:subClassOf resource="Class" />
> </rdfs:Class>
should be rdf:resource="#Class"
> <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="DeprecatedProperty">
> <rdfs:subClassOf resource="Property" />
> </rdfs:Class>
should be rdf:resource="&rdf;Property"
Thanks!
Mike
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 13:40:30 UTC