W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: ISSUE 5.14 Closing Text

From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:39:14 -0800
Message-Id: <200212091839.KAA24516@escher.SD.BBN.COM>
To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
cc: WebOnt <www-webont-wg@w3.org>


This looks good.  A few comments:

> priorVersion
> backCompatibleWith
> incompatibleWith
> deprecatedClass
> deprecatedProperty

These should be DeprecatedClass and DeprecatedProperty,
consistent with the later usage.  If we're spelling things
out, I'd prefer backwardCompatibleWith.

> In addition, we will remove the following identifier from the OWL namespace.
> versionInfo

I'm opposed to this.  I've found daml:versionInfo (e.g.
with CVS identifiers) very helpful for configuration
management and debugging, and I don't think it conflicts
with the newer constructs.

> <owl:backCompatWith rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/vehicle-1.0">

should be backCompatibleWith (or backwardCompatibleWith)

> <!-- assume Automobile is now the preferred term for Car -->

It would be good to capture this in the graph, e.g.

  <owl:DeprecatedClass rdf:ID="Car">
    <rdfs:comment>Automobile is now preferred</rdfs:comment>

> <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="DeprecatedClass">
>    <rdfs:subClassOf resource="Class" />
> </rdfs:Class>

should be rdf:resource="#Class"

> <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="DeprecatedProperty">
>    <rdfs:subClassOf resource="Property" />
> </rdfs:Class>

should be rdf:resource="&rdf;Property"


Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 13:40:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:39 UTC