- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 16:17:21 -0500 (EST)
- To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com> Subject: SEM: rdfs:subPropertyOf cases Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 01:17:05 +0100 > > I gathered that > > owl:allDifferent rdfs:subPropertyOf owl:oneOf . I don't see where this would come from. > owl:backCompatWith rdfs:subPropertyOf owl:priorVersion . I don't think that this is necessarily the case. > owl:imports rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:seeAlso . This is not the way I would think of this. > owl:sameClassAs rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subClassOf . > owl:samePropertyAs rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subPropertyOf . These appear to be truths to me, but they are only derivable in Full OWL. > owl:versionInfo rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:comment . I can't image why anyone would want this. > and wonder if that's OK and wether there are other cases? > > -- , > Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ peter
Received on Sunday, 8 December 2002 16:17:47 UTC