Re: ISSUE 5.14: Revised proposal to close ontology versioning

[on 2002-12-02 Jeff Heflin wrote]
> Hello everyone,
>
> Based on feedback via e-mail and the telecon of 11/21, here is a revised
> proposal for ontology versioning. This message is divided into the core
> proposal, and two options about how it should be included in OWL.
>
>
> CORE PROPOSAL
> ---------------
> I propose to add the following identifiers to the OWL namespace:
>
> priorVersion
> backCompatWith
> deprecatedClass
> deprecatedProperty
>
> In short, none of these identifier will have any additional impact on
> the semantics. I will now describe each of these in turn.

Jeff, what about owl:versionInfo ?
owl:versionInfo
  rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:comment;
  rdfs:seeAlso
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-owl-ref-20021112/#versionInfo-def> .

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Friday, 6 December 2002 05:24:59 UTC