- From: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
- Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:10:01 -0500
- To: WebOnt <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Dan and I accidentally started this discussion off-list (my fault). Here's Dan's response to my earlier message today. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ISSUE 5.14: Revised proposal to close ontology versioning Date: 03 Dec 2002 08:58:45 -0600 From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu> CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> References: <3DEBDA49.97266CBD@cse.lehigh.edu><1038867728.5320.11617.camel@dirk> <3DECC08C.2BBD66A7@cse.lehigh.edu> On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 08:32, Jeff Heflin wrote: > Dan, > > I had originally responded to your suggestions in [1], perhaps you > missed > that message? Oops; just neglected to respond; sorry... > In particular, regarding versionOf, I said: > > > While I think that something like this is an excellent idea for tech > > reports, I think it could be dangerous for ontologies. First, of all > > what is the generic ontology? Is it just the most recent version, as is > > done with tech reports? If so, then if people start using this namespace > > and importing this ontology, what happens when a modification is made > > that isn't backward compatible? Folks that link to the latest version accept that risk; the offsetting benefit is that they get the latest improvements to the ontology "for free". > > Essentially, it would "break" existing > > documents. I'd much rather document authors to be explicit about what > > version of an ontology they commit to, and put the burden on them to > > upgrade at whatever pace they feel comfortable with. > > Would you care to comment on this? Perhaps it would help if you gave > some more details on how you think versionOf would be used in an > ontology context. It seems to me that the ontology context is completely parallel to the spec context: folks that trust W3C to Do The Right Thing just link to the latest version; folks that want to review every change link to a specific dated version. Oops; I just realized this is offlist. Please forward it or whatever; I'm in the middle of other stuff. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 10:10:42 UTC