- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 22 Aug 2002 14:48:02 -0500
- To: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>, WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 13:00, Christopher Welty wrote: > > I also want to appeal the decision to have the 5th f2f in Manchester. OK, noted. Actually, after looking up the formal appeal process, I'm currently looking at this as a request to the chairs to reconsider or vacate their decision, and/or an objection to the record of the 15Aug meeting. A formal appeal goes via your AC rep to The Director and involves a whole bunch of stuff that I'm hoping isn't necessary... "Appeal of a Chair's decision Participants should always try to resolve issues within the group and should register with the Chair any objections they may have to a decision (e.g., a decision made as the result of a vote). When participants of a Member organization believe that their concerns are not being duly considered within the group, they may ask the Director (via their Advisory Committee representative) to confirm or deny the decision. The participants should also make their requests known to the Team contact. The Team contact is responsible for informing the Director when invited experts raise concerns about due process. Any requests to the Director to confirm a decision must include a summary of the issue (whether technical or procedural), decision, and rationale for the objection. All counter-arguments, rationales, and decisions must be archived." -- http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/groups.html#WGVotes -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2002 15:48:06 UTC