- From: Michael Denny <mike.denny@aviex.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 18:25:01 -0400
- To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
I am embarking on an ontology building mission and wish to comply as thoroughly as possible with the latest DAML+OIL spec (because the consensus seems to be that this is the leading contender for semantic web adoption). While several editors like Protégé 2000 (with the OIL plugin), OilEd and OntoEdit seem to be available with some maturity, I am floundering in trying to gauge how complete their support of the spec really is. Can anyone offer an opinion as to which most fully exploits the DAML+OIL representation, or where I might encounter deficiencies. I understand that all these tools are evolving quickly, and accept that any answer may be fleeting. Thanks from a newcomer to your list (the list's archive search doesn't seem to be working). I have posted this inquiry to both the www-webont-wg@w3.org and www-rdf-logic@w3.org lists as I couldn't tell which was the appropriate one -- my apologies if I'm in the wrong place. Michael Denny
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2001 18:25:15 UTC