RE: SEARCH by last path segment, Was: SEARCH for displayname

Hi,

<julian>
is this mandatory or optional?
</julian>

as you stated, the best spec is the one without optional features. However,
my feeling is to set it optional.

<julian>
are people aware that path segments will always be URL-encoded, so 
that in order to match an "A umlaut", you'll have to insert a sequence 
of percent-escaped bytes? (and that in this case, caseless matching will 
probably not work as expected)?
</julian>

answer will follow in a separate mail...

Martin


-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
Sent: Dienstag, 25. November 2003 13:33
To: Wallmer, Martin
Cc: 'www-webdav-dasl@w3.org'
Subject: Re: SEARCH by last path segment, Was: SEARCH for displayname


Martin,

I think that this will work.

Open issues:

- is this mandatory or optional?

- are people aware that path segments will always be URL-encoded, so 
that in order to match an "A umlaut", you'll have to insert a sequence 
of percent-escaped bytes? (and that in this case, caseless matching will 
probably not work as expected)?

Regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760