- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:41:05 -0800
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Wallmer, Martin'" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>
- Cc: <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
> - are people aware that path segments will always be URL-encoded, so > that in order to match an "A umlaut", you'll have to insert a > sequence > of percent-escaped bytes? (and that in this case, caseless > matching will > probably not work as expected)? > If we make pathsegments be unencoded, then we have another advantage to using that special syntax: it *can* do caseless matching. We could name it "decoded-path-segment" if that would make it less confusing to have different encoding requirements than the URL. Cool! lisa
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2003 12:41:12 UTC