- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:44:41 +0100
- To: <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCKEDJGDAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Elias & Jim, I think the spec is very clear about the difference about undefined properties, and properties that *are* defined and just happen to have an empty value. In particular: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-search-latest.html#nul l-values Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 -----Original Message----- From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Elias Sinderson Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:19 PM To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org Subject: Re: issue: unprecise wording in appendix A (three-valued-logic) Hi, I feel that removing the sentence will lead to interoperability issues in the future - it would be better to simply clarify the issue as Jim suggests. How about something along the lines of the following: "If a property in the current resource under scan has not been set to a value (either because the property itself is undefined or the property is empty for the current resource), then the value of that property is undefined for the resource under scan." Perhaps another sentence to explain how undefined values are sorted? Elias Jim Whitehead wrote: I think it would help interoperability to add a sentence (or 1-2 short examples) that stated how DASL implementations should treat empty/"undefined" DAV properties. Frankly, I can see myself not getting this right... - Jim -----Original Message----- From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Julian Reschke Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 7:20 AM To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org Subject: issue: unprecise wording in appendix A (three-valued-logic) In [1] the current draft says: "If a property in the current resource under scan has not been set to a value (either because the property is not defined for the current resource, or because it is null for the current resource), then the value of that property is undefined for the resource under scan." However, WebDAV properties never have a "null" value. They may be empty, such as <foo xmlns="bar" /> or <foo xmlns="bar"></foo> but that's just a string value with length 0. Proposal: just remove that sentence. [1] <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-search-late st.html#rf c.section.A.p.3> -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 13:45:38 UTC