- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:36:37 +0100
- To: "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
I thought about that as well, but I really couldn't find a case where a property would be present and would be reported with a 2xx status that isn't actually 200. -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 > -----Original Message----- > From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jim Whitehead > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 6:24 PM > To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > Subject: RE: Issue with "Treatment of NULL Values" > > > > > The draft currently says: > > > > "If a PROPFIND for a property value would yield a 404 or 403 > response for > > that property, then that property is considered NULL." > > > > Shouldn't this say: > > > > "If a PROPFIND for a property value would yield any non-200 > (OK) response > > for that property, then that property is considered NULL." > > Perhaps this should be 2xx. > > - Jim >
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 12:37:13 UTC