- From: Wallmer, Martin <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:35:02 +0200
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Hi, good idea to deal with datatypes :-) some questions a:) how the server may happen to have information about the type of a dead property? b:) what if the server knows about the datatype, and the type in the query does not match? Regards, Martin -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2002 13:47 To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org Subject: DAV:gte vs. numerical property values Hi, let's consider a dead property "foo", and some resources a, b and c on which this dead property is defined and has the values "1", "3" and "10". Consider a DAV:basicsearch with the where clause: <gte xmlns="DAV:"> <prop><foo xmlns=""/></prop> <literal>3</literal> </gte> Which resource will match? As DAV:basicsearch currently isn't type-aware, the server will have to do a string comparison, and only the b (with value "3") will match. Is this really sufficient? It basically means that dead property comparisons are restricted to strings. Proposals: a) If the server happens to have type information for a dead property, it should try to do a comparison according to the known property type, if the literal can be parsed into this type. This basically replicates the behaviour that a client would expect when querying on live properties such as DAV:getcontentlength, so it could be taken as a simple clarification. Extended proposal: b) A client can enforce comparison using a specific data type by specifying the type in the query, for instance using: <gte xmlns="DAV:"> <prop><foo xmlns=""/></prop> <literal xsi:type="xs:long">3</literal> </gte> Julian [1] <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-search-latest.html#rf c.issue.JW16b/JW24a> -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2002 10:35:08 UTC