- From: Wallmer, Martin <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:28:45 +0100
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Wallmer, Martin" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
From my point of view no objections against hyphen based syntax. Martin -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Freitag, 22. März 2002 09:25 To: Wallmer, Martin; www-webdav-dasl@w3.org Subject: RE: is-collection - isdefined Yes. "iscollection" existed before and had different semantics. Actually, I'd prefer to move everything to hypen-based syntax, but that would break "compatibility" to older versions of the draft (does it really matter? just asking.). > -----Original Message----- > From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Wallmer, Martin > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:13 AM > To: 'www-webdav-dasl@w3.org' > Subject: is-collection - isdefined > > > Hi, > > just a very minor detail. Is there a reason why is-collection is written > with a hyphen and isdefined not? If there is no reason I would suggest to > write both without hyphen. > > Regards, > Martin Wallmer > Research & Development > Software AG ++49 6151 92 1831 > Uhlandstr. 12 > D 64297 Darmstadt > >
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 03:28:48 UTC