RE: comment on issues in DASL draft: query on href

> So if we really need to provide this feature, I'd define a
> new construct
> like:
> <D:like>
>       <D:binding-name/>	<!-- borrowed from RFC3253 -->
>       <D:literal>image/%</D:literal>
> </D:like>
> which of course would only work for the last path segment.

Name the construct <D:path/> (or path-name) instead of <D:binding-name>, and
then it will work for the whole path as well as the last segment. Of course
the major thing is not to name it right, but to define it so that it covers
what you want. Does the user want both?


Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2002 22:36:53 UTC