- From: Yaron Goland (Exchange) <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:53:55 -0700
- To: "'Jim Whitehead'" <ejw@ics.uci.edu>, "'DASL'" <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
I fail to understand how the search arbiter being a new resource type and the query question related. I would like to see search arbiters as a new resource type so I can do queries looking for all the arbiters on a server. I also would like to see search arbiters as a new resource type so that I can check the resource type of the search arbiter, see that it is a search arbiter and know that it follows certain rules and regulations. Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Whitehead [mailto:ejw@ics.uci.edu] > Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 3:40 PM > To: 'DASL' > Subject: RE: JW3: What if search arbiter is in a query scope > > > > > > I would recommend not putting search arbiters in > > the scope of a query, and would expect that to be the > > normal case. > > I anticipate many servers making each collection a search > arbiter, and hence > a search arbiter would likely end up in the scope of many queries. > > > If someone implements that, then that search arbiter would > obviously have > to > > respond like any other resource in the scope of a query responds. > > But, I do find myself agreeing with this. If a search > arbiter is not a new > resource type, as I now favor, then the behavior under search is no > different than if the same resource didn't support the SEARCH method. > > If there is agreement that a search arbiter isn't a new > resource type, this > issue can also be closed. > > - Jim >
Received on Monday, 16 August 1999 18:56:29 UTC