- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:12:14 -0700
- To: "Babich, Alan" <ABabich@filenet.com>, "'DASL'" <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
> "The BNF for a wildcard permits the entry of "</d:literal>" which > would confuse parsers." > > The spec. is precise and correct. The second operand > of the "like" operator is a string literal. (This > is completely consistent with all the other operators.) > The syntax of the pattern contained in this string literal > is given by the BNF in section 5.12.1. The only parser that > needs to parse the body of the string literal is the > parser embedded inside the query engine, > in the implementation of the "like" operator. > The XML parser won't be confused. > So, I disagree that either parser would get "confused". > Parsers don't get confused, people do (and then > they write bugs). Implementers just need to read > the spec. carefully. An XML parser typically doesn't understand the contents inside its elements, hence an XML parser which saw the sequence: <d:literal>asdasdada</d:literal></d:literal> Would be confused, since it would end the element at the first </d:literal> and would flag an error at the second </d:literal>. The BNF for the interior of a literal element allows this to happen, and hence, in my opinion, should be changed to escape "<" characters. - Jim
Received on Thursday, 24 June 1999 20:14:22 UTC