- From: Carlos Verdes <cverdes@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 15:03:57 +0000
- To: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@alcatel-lucent.com>
- Cc: www-voice@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAMZOHDMJV+kRJ34SuAVmPskUfwZxyygv161oyeS6C=ocVaSWEQ@mail.gmail.com>
That has sense for me either, thanks for your time. On 8 December 2011 15:02, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@alcatel-lucent.com>wrote: > Carlos,**** > > After discussion within the working group, we would like to clarify that > entry order is the same as document order. The order of invocations would > be the same (so: P-->S1-->*S11*-->S2-->*S21*-->S3-->S31). **** > > ** ** > > Jim**** > > *From:* Carlos Verdes [mailto:cverdes@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2011 6:54 PM > > *To:* Jim Barnett; www-voice@w3.org > *Subject:* SCXML entry order**** > > ** ** > > Hi Jim,**** > > ** ** > > I'm trying to implement SCXML in Java, and is crazy that I started with > this because I used to work for CSC with people from Alcatel and their > state machine oriented platform for intelligent networking.**** > > ** ** > > Now I have a simple question about entry order I hope you could answer.*** > * > > ** ** > > If we have the state machine:**** > > <parallel id="P">**** > > <state id="S1">**** > > <state id="S11"/>**** > > <state id="S12"/>**** > > </state>**** > > <state id="S2">**** > > <state id="S21"/>**** > > <state id="S22"/>**** > > <transition event="e" target="S22" />**** > > </state>**** > > <state id="S3">**** > > <state id="S31"/>**** > > <state id="S32"/>**** > > </state>**** > > <transition event="e" target="S32" type="internal"/>**** > > </parallel>**** > > ** ** > > Which should be the entry order?**** > > ** ** > > If I interprets ancestors before I should do like:**** > > P-->S1-->S2-->S3-->*S11-->S21--S31***** > > ** ** > > But for me it has more sense:**** > > P-->S1-->*S11*-->S2-->*S21*-->S3-->S31**** > > ** ** > > Which is the same as document order... which is the proper one?**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > And I have another question about this part of the algorithm**** > procedure enterStates(enabledTransitions)**** > > ...**** > > for s in statesToEnter:**** > > statesToInvoke.add(s)**** > > statesToEnter = statesToEnter.toList().sort(enterOrder)**** > > ** ** > > When we add states in statesToInvoke we are not following any concrete > order, however statesToEnter is an ordered set.**** > > Should be this order the document order, or insertion order in states to > enter?**** > > ** ** > > To put an example with the previous configuration > [P,S1,S11,S2,S21,S3,S31], event e occur:**** > > ---------------------**** > > atomicStates [S11,S21,S31]**** > > S11 has no transition, go to parent S1, no transitions, parent P enables > transition P-->S32**** > > S2 enables transition S2-->S21**** > > enabledTransitions[P-->S32, S2-->S21]**** > > ** ** > > ---------------------**** > > transition1: P-->S32 internal**** > > ancestor-->P (t.source)**** > > statesToEnter [S32]**** > > ** ** > > getProperAncestors(S32) -->[S3]**** > > statesToEnter[S32,S3]**** > > ** ** > > S3 is not parallel --> next transition**** > > ** ** > > ---------------------**** > > transition 2: S2-->S21**** > > ancestor --> P (LCA)**** > > statesToEnter[S32,S3,S21,S2]**** > > ** ** > > -----------------------------------**** > > And do for s in statesToEnter:**** > > ** ** > > statesToInvoke.add(s)**** > > statesToEnter = statesToEnter.toList().sort(enterOrder)**** > > ** ** > > So **** > > statesToInvoke[S32,S3,S21,S2]**** > > statesToEnter[S2,S3,S21,S22] or [S2,S21,S3,S31]**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Could you please give me some light on this scenario please?**** > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > Carlos Verdes.**** > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files attached may contain > confidential and proprietary information of Alcatel-Lucent and/or its > affiliated entities. Access by the intended recipient only is authorized. > Any liability arising from any party acting, or refraining from acting, on > any information contained in this e-mail is hereby excluded. If you are not > the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, destroy the > original transmission and its attachments and do not disclose the contents > to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Copyright in this e-mail and any attachments > belongs to Alcatel-Lucent and/or its affiliated entities. >
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 15:04:34 UTC