- From: Carlos Verdes <cverdes@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:53:49 +0000
- To: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@alcatel-lucent.com>, www-voice@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAMZOHDPFeoF6Jd2TF1FEcUwvY9Gef0pRUraNoSD8zZ00BSDPZg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jim, I'm trying to implement SCXML in Java, and is crazy that I started with this because I used to work for CSC with people from Alcatel and their state machine oriented platform for intelligent networking. Now I have a simple question about entry order I hope you could answer. If we have the state machine: <parallel id="P"> <state id="S1"> <state id="S11"/> <state id="S12"/> </state> <state id="S2"> <state id="S21"/> <state id="S22"/> <transition event="e" target="S22" /> </state> <state id="S3"> <state id="S31"/> <state id="S32"/> </state> <transition event="e" target="S32" type="internal"/> </parallel> Which should be the entry order? If I interprets ancestors before I should do like: P-->S1-->S2-->S3-->*S11-->S21--S31* But for me it has more sense: P-->S1-->*S11*-->S2-->*S21*-->S3-->S31 Which is the same as document order... which is the proper one? And I have another question about this part of the algorithm procedure enterStates(enabledTransitions) .... for s in statesToEnter: statesToInvoke.add(s) statesToEnter = statesToEnter.toList().sort(enterOrder) When we add states in statesToInvoke we are not following any concrete order, however statesToEnter is an ordered set. Should be this order the document order, or insertion order in states to enter? To put an example with the previous configuration [P,S1,S11,S2,S21,S3,S31], event e occur: --------------------- atomicStates [S11,S21,S31] S11 has no transition, go to parent S1, no transitions, parent P enables transition P-->S32 S2 enables transition S2-->S21 enabledTransitions[P-->S32, S2-->S21] --------------------- transition1: P-->S32 internal ancestor-->P (t.source) statesToEnter [S32] getProperAncestors(S32) -->[S3] statesToEnter[S32,S3] S3 is not parallel --> next transition --------------------- transition 2: S2-->S21 ancestor --> P (LCA) statesToEnter[S32,S3,S21,S2] ----------------------------------- And do for s in statesToEnter: statesToInvoke.add(s) statesToEnter = statesToEnter.toList().sort(enterOrder) So statesToInvoke[S32,S3,S21,S2] statesToEnter[S2,S3,S21,S22] or [S2,S21,S3,S31] Could you please give me some light on this scenario please? Regards, Carlos Verdes.
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 09:34:09 UTC