- From: Petr Kuba <kuba@optimsys.cz>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:45:58 +0200
- To: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com>
- CC: www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>
RJ, We do not have further comments, the resolution is OK. Thanks, Petr On 16.9.2010 5:25, RJ Auburn wrote: > Petr: > > We agree and have updated the spec to make this property optional. > > We have closed out this issue. please let us know if you have any further comments or concerns, > > Best regards, > > RJ > > --- > RJ Auburn > CTO, Voxeo Corporation > tel:+1-407-418-1800 > skype:zscgeek > > > > On Jun 3, 2010, at 8:42 AM, RJ Auburn wrote: > >> This thread is tracked as ISSUE-717. >> >> >> --- >> RJ Auburn >> CTO, Voxeo Corporation >> tel:+1-407-418-1800 >> >> Come join us at our Voxeo Customer Summit >> June 21st – June 23rd at the Hard Rock Hotel >> Register today for your All Access Pass: >> http://www.voxeo.com/summits/customer >> >> >> >> >> On May 28, 2010, at 4:46 AM, Petr Kuba wrote: >> >>> Hello www-voice, >>> >>> In 7_3.txml, assetion 430 tests presence of the reason property in dialog.terminatetransfer. >>> >>> May I ask why this property is required according to the Specification? VoiceXML specification doesn't provide any reason for the terminate transfer request and therefore only some general description can be used in this case. It is obviously not very useful. I believe the same problem can appear for other dialog systems besides VoiceXML. >>> >>> We would recommend to make the reason property optional. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Petr >>> >>> -- >>> Petr Kuba, Project Manager >>> OptimSys, s.r.o >>> kuba@optimsys.cz >>> Tel: +420 541 143 065 >>> Fax: +420 541 143 066 >>> http://www.optimsys.cz >>> >>
Received on Thursday, 16 September 2010 06:46:30 UTC