W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: July CCXML Implementation Report: 10_5_7: improper error event used in <join> - ISSUE-745 (Was ISSUE-692)

From: Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:51:43 +0200
To: 'Petr Kuba' <kuba@optimsys.cz>
CC: Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>, "'www-voice@w3.org'" <www-voice@w3.org>, 'RJ Auburn' <rj@voxeo.com>, "'W3C Voice Browser Working Group'" <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20E062AE0851CC41B7FBECC23638796F394A1230EE@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>

We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to IR. The goal is to finalize the test-suite during the PR transition.
Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider it implicitly accepted.
If you need clarifications, please ask them very soon.

Paolo Baggia
Author of CCXML-IR Plan


We suspect you misinterpreted the test. The 'general_connid' is correct, while 'session.values.sessionOneConnID' is also correct but cannot be used because it belongs to another section.

This to test the following assertion #962:
  "Any Connections or Dialogs referenced by the 'id1' and 'id2' attributes
   of join MUST be owned by the session performing the join."

Therefore an error.conference.join must be generated.

From: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com> 
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:58:31 -0400
Cc: www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>, W3C Voice Browser Working Group <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org> 
Message-Id: <353C9667-B12C-446C-8E42-F7AF3952796E@voxeo.com> 
To: Petr Kuba <kuba@optimsys.cz> 

Ok, I take that back, this is now being broken out as ISSUE-745. PAolo will reply with details on this shortly. 


RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation

On Jul 29, 2010, at 10:54 AM, RJ Auburn wrote:

> To confirm this is being tracked as ISSUE-692
> On Jul 26, 2010, at 7:50 AM, Petr Kuba wrote:
>> Hello www-voice,
>> In 10_5_7, script 10_5_7_A_962.ccxml, assertion 962, the following code is used:
>> 	<join id1="session.values.sessionOneConnID"
>> 		id2="general_connid"/>
>> Since general_connid is incorrect <join> must fail. The test expects that error.conference.join should be sent in this case.
>> In this case we are not sure whether error.conference.join or error.semantic event should be thrown.
>> For further discussion see our previous message:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2010AprJun/0068.html
>> This was tracked as ISSUE-692 and we are still waiting for the resolution.
>> Please clarify on this.
>> Thanks,
>> Petr
>> -- 
>> Petr Kuba, Project Manager
>> OptimSys, s.r.o
>> kuba@optimsys.cz
>> Tel: +420 541 143 065
>> Fax: +420 541 143 066
>> http://www.optimsys.cz
Received on Friday, 27 August 2010 12:52:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:03:57 UTC