Re: July CCXML Implementation Report: 10_5_7: improper error event used in <join> - ISSUE-745 (Was ISSUE-692)

Ok, I take that back, this is now being broken out as ISSUE-745. PAolo will reply with details on this shortly. 

	RJ

---
RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation
tel:+1-407-418-1800 
skype:zscgeek 



On Jul 29, 2010, at 10:54 AM, RJ Auburn wrote:

> To confirm this is being tracked as ISSUE-692
> 
> On Jul 26, 2010, at 7:50 AM, Petr Kuba wrote:
> 
>> Hello www-voice,
>> 
>> In 10_5_7, script 10_5_7_A_962.ccxml, assertion 962, the following code is used:
>> 
>> 	<join id1="session.values.sessionOneConnID"
>> 		id2="general_connid"/>
>> 
>> Since general_connid is incorrect <join> must fail. The test expects that error.conference.join should be sent in this case.
>> 
>> In this case we are not sure whether error.conference.join or error.semantic event should be thrown.
>> 
>> For further discussion see our previous message:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2010AprJun/0068.html
>> This was tracked as ISSUE-692 and we are still waiting for the resolution.
>> 
>> Please clarify on this.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Petr
>> 
>> -- 
>> Petr Kuba, Project Manager
>> OptimSys, s.r.o
>> kuba@optimsys.cz
>> Tel: +420 541 143 065
>> Fax: +420 541 143 066
>> http://www.optimsys.cz
>> 
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 26 August 2010 14:59:07 UTC