Re: CCXML specification: typo in Appendix K.3 - ISSUE-675

Petr:

We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to CCXML IR and specification. 

* This change has been applied to the CCXML spec and will be in the PR version of the document when we next publish. 

Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider it implicitly accepted.
If you need clarifications, please feel free to let us know and we will do our best to resolve them.

Best regards,

	RJ

---
RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation
tel:+1-407-418-1800 
skype:zscgeek 



On Apr 13, 2010, at 8:53 AM, RJ Auburn wrote:

> Petr:
> 
> Good find. This is tracked as ISSUE-675. We will get that fixed.
> 
> 	RJ
> 
> ---
> RJ Auburn
> CTO, Voxeo Corporation
> tel:+1-407-418-1800
> 
> On Apr 13, 2010, at 4:59 AM, Petr Kuba wrote:
> 
>> Hello www-voice,
>> 
>> It looks like there has been a typo in Appendix K.3 introduced in the Candidate Recommendation.
>> 
>> The sentence in the second paragraph below the reserved HTTP parameters list reads:
>> 
>> For example, a parameter named "1" with a value of "1" represents
>> an object named "a", which has a property "b" with a value of "1".
>> 
>> The sentence should be:
>> 
>> For example, a parameter named "a.b" with a value of "1" represents
>> an object named "a", which has a property "b" with a value of "1".
>> 
>> The problem is in the parameter name: it is "1" and should be "a.b".
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Petr Kuba
>> 
>> -- 
>>  Petr Kuba, Project Manager
>>  OptimSys, s.r.o
>>  kuba@optimsys.cz
>>  Tel: +420 541 143 065
>>  Fax: +420 541 143 066
>>  http://www.optimsys.cz
>> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 19 August 2010 11:50:07 UTC