>>Regarding the IR test we will send out a modified version of the session scope >>test that should work around this issue for review later today or tomorrow. RJ, This is great news. One quick thought on concerns anyone might have about "behavior" differences: You are most likely to run into portability issues between a FAST parse model vs. the line by line(LBL) if you use poor programming practices when writing the CCXML such as 1: <assign name="x" expr="3"/> <var name="x"/> or 2: <var name="id" expr="'whatever'"/> <!-- bad because id is a session var in ccxml --> Both of the above would be flagged during peer review at our little office... If you have poor app-writing, you probably will also fail to answer calls and start/terminate dialogs correctly, even if you are processing LBL. -- Chris Davis Interact Incorporated R&D 512-502-9969x117Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 17:11:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:03:57 UTC