W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: CCXML Implementation Report - current status and deadline.

From: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 01:10:34 -0400
Cc: www-voice@w3.org
Message-Id: <B0EB570B-8D9D-4B1F-8EF2-F13C5BE04DCB@voxeo.com>
To: Chris Davis <davisc@iivip.com>

Thanks for all the feedback on this. IT's been very helpful in making CCXML a better spec . 

RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation

Come join us at our Voxeo Customer Summit
June 21st  June 23rd at the Hard Rock Hotel
Register today for your All Access Pass:  

On May 25, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Chris Davis wrote:

> We can provide an implementation report by Friday but it will be referencing the following open issues:
> ISSUE-680
> ISSUE-670
> ISSUE-697
> ISSUE-693
> ISSUE-696
> ISSUE-677
> ISSUE-689
> ISSUE-672
> ISSUE-690
> ISSUE-694
> ISSUE-695
> It also references problems we emailed the list about but never got issues assigned on the following days:
> 05/18/10
> 05/14/10
> 05/21/10
> 05/24/10
> (these can be seen on the list archive)
> The good news is at this point we have made it through all the test assertions, making some modifications where necessary
> and we described those in issues and/or emails. Our IR will have some value in this regard.
> I'm done spamming everyone with test issues :)
> Regards,
> Chris
> Petr Kuba wrote:
>> RJ,
>> Could you please inform us about current situation of the Implementation Report? Deadline for submission of a CCXML Implementation Report is this Friday. Is it still valid?
>> For sure we want to send our implementation report but it is a little bit hard task because we haven't received answers for plenty of our comments. It means that we will have to prepare the implementation report which will be influenced by modifications that are not confirmed. Does it make sense or could you suggest some better solution?
>> In the email below you expected to have answers to our questions within a week. Obviously something had to break your plan. Could you please give us some updated estimates?
>> Generally speaking, it would be very helpful for us to get up-to-date information whenever your plans get changed.
>> Thanks for your response,
>> Petr Kuba
> -- 
> Chris Davis
> Interact Incorporated R&D
> 512-502-9969x117
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 05:11:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:03:56 UTC