Re: [Fwd: April CCXML: bad function in test document 6_1.txml] - ISSUE-678

Chris:

No problem. For formal tracking reasons this was tracked as ISSUE-678. I have closed this issue out however in our tracking system. 

	RJ

---
RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation
tel:+1-407-418-1800

Come join us at our Voxeo Customer Summit, June 21st – June 23rd at the Hard Rock Hotel, register today for your All Access Pass:  
http://www.voxeo.com/summits/customer



On Apr 17, 2010, at 7:03 AM, Chris Davis wrote:

> Hello www-voice,
> 
> I am withdrawing the forwarded comment - I had forgotten about the ccxml scope!
> 
> -- 
> Chris Davis
> Interact Incorporated R&D
> 512-502-9969x117
> 
> 
> From: Chris Davis <davisc@iivip.com>
> Date: April 15, 2010 11:52:53 PM GMT+08:00
> To: www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>
> Subject: April CCXML: bad function in test document 6_1.txml
> 
> 
> Hello www-voice,
> 
> There is some bad javascript in 6_1.txml of http://www.w3.org/Voice/2009/ccxml-irp/ccxml10-irp-20100331.zip
> 
> The segment of code that reads
> <var name="counter" expr="0"/>
>     <script>
>       function next()
>       {
>         ccxml.counter = ccxml.counter + 1;
>         return ccxml.counter;
>       }
>     </script>
> 
> should be instead
> <var name="counter" expr="0"/>
>     <script>
>       function next()
>       {
>         counter = counter + 1;
>         return counter;
>       }
>     </script>
> 
> The fact that ccxml is not a defined object before being referenced causes the javascript to burst.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -- 
> Chris Davis
> Interact Incorporated R&D
> 512-502-9969x117
> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:43:50 UTC