- From: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:04:53 -0500
- To: "Yakulis, Ross (Ross)" <yakulis@avaya.com>
- Cc: "Barnett, James" <James.Barnett@aspect.com>, <www-voice@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <00895C37-DA04-4330-B145-10684D700D8C@voxeo.com>
Ross, I would have to agree with you and this will get re-raised in the working group to see about being changed in an upcoming spec update. RJ --- RJ Auburn CTO, Voxeo Corporation tel:+1-407-418-1800 On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:56 :08, Yakulis, Ross (Ross) wrote: > But cancel seem really basic (to me), especially since there is a > sendid and delay, this implies > an event is cancelable and should be a base part of SCXML. For a > standard to be standard > there needs to be some basic commonality between various "scxml > implementations", and cancel > is the compliment of send. If all implementations have to > implement cancel then there is little > portability of SCXML documents. Said another way if too much is > "platform" specific, > it there really any "standard"? > > Ross > > > From: Barnett, James [mailto:James.Barnett@aspect.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 6:11 AM > To: Yakulis, Ross (Ross); www-voice@w3.org > Subject: RE: SCXML cancel event? > > We had <cancel> in an earlier draft, then took it out as an attempt > to simplify the basic set of executable content. We will be > reviewing <send>/<invoke> functionality in a future draft. In the > meantime, if you need <cancel>, you can add it as a platform- > specific extension. (In general, we intend for platforms to provide > extra executable content suitable for their specific applications.) > > - Jim > From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Yakulis, Ross (Ross) > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 4:30 PM > To: www-voice@w3.org > Subject: SCXML cancel event? > > Should the spec have a <cancel/> tag that allows on to cancel a > delayed event? > > Ross Yakulis >
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2007 15:05:51 UTC