- From: Yakulis, Ross (Ross) <yakulis@avaya.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:56:08 -0700
- To: "Barnett, James" <James.Barnett@aspect.com>, <www-voice@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <14BE7669BDEB544EA8C2116DAF4B7E559B034C@306181ANEX2.global.avaya.com>
But cancel seem really basic (to me), especially since there is a sendid and delay, this implies an event is cancelable and should be a base part of SCXML. For a standard to be standard there needs to be some basic commonality between various "scxml implementations", and cancel is the compliment of send. If all implementations have to implement cancel then there is little portability of SCXML documents. Said another way if too much is "platform" specific, it there really any "standard"? Ross ________________________________ From: Barnett, James [mailto:James.Barnett@aspect.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 6:11 AM To: Yakulis, Ross (Ross); www-voice@w3.org Subject: RE: SCXML cancel event? We had <cancel> in an earlier draft, then took it out as an attempt to simplify the basic set of executable content. We will be reviewing <send>/<invoke> functionality in a future draft. In the meantime, if you need <cancel>, you can add it as a platform-specific extension. (In general, we intend for platforms to provide extra executable content suitable for their specific applications.) - Jim ________________________________ From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yakulis, Ross (Ross) Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 4:30 PM To: www-voice@w3.org Subject: SCXML cancel event? Should the spec have a <cancel/> tag that allows on to cancel a delayed event? Ross Yakulis
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 15:56:28 UTC