Paul Grosso and Norman Walsh Co-chairs, XML Core I'm writing to you as co-chairs of the XML Core Working Group about an issue that Dan Connolly believes will be of interest to you. The issue is centered in the last call working draft of VoiceXML 2.1, an extension to the VoiceXML 2.0 language that reached full recommendation on March 16, 2004. Dan Connolly has raised an issue[1] with the VoiceXML 2.1 last call working draft, specifically about the Processing Instruction section [2] which exposes an XML document referenced by the <data> element via the DOM to a voice application in which the interpreter should validate that the host requesting the document is allowed to access the data. We are planning a telecon to discuss this issue. Is there someone in your working group who can help us address this issue in a forthcoming telecon being organized by Brad Porter? Regards, -Jim Larson Co-chair, Voice Browser Working Group <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-voicexml21-20040728/#sec-data-security> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2005JanMar/0065.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-voicexml21-20040728/#sec-data-securityReceived on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 17:53:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:03:50 UTC