- From: Ken Rehor <krehor@vocalocity.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:49:53 -0700
- To: <www-voice@w3c.org>
Please note that Vocalocity has made OpenVXI 3.0 available under GPL. See our OpenVXI FAQ at http://www.vocalocity.net/uploads/100006_productdatasheets/100074.pdf for more info. Ken Rehor krehor@vocalocity.net > -----Original Message----- > From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Robert Stewart > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 8:13 AM > To: Werner Dittmann > Cc: www-voice@w3c.org > Subject: Re: Questions about CCXML and CCXML interpreter > > > The following W3C license is used with the W3C web browser Amaya. > http://w3c.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231 > > For comparison in the VoiceXML space, the open source VXML browser > OpenVXI is licensed under the ScanSoft Public License, which is a very > non-restrictive license. > http://fife.speech.cs.cmu.edu/openvxi/sspl.html > > The ScanSoft Public License is very similar in content to the BSD > License > http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php > > OpenSource.org has an extensive listing of licenses suitable for use > with open source projects. http://opensource.org/licenses/ > > As for which license you choose, it depends on what you are trying to > accomplish. For example, do you want to allow commercial uses, do you > require attribution, do you want to require that any derivative works be > licensed under the same license you choose, do you want to make a > statement against software patents, etc. Based on your email, I > recommend evaluating the following licenses in this priority order: BSD, > W3C, Apache, CPL, GPL. > > For a project repository, I highly recommend SourceForge. I've used > SourceForge for a couple years to maintain open source VoiceXML > applications I've written. > http://sourceforge.net/index.php > > I'm very happy to hear about your project. I look forward to trying it > out. > > Robert Stewart > > On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 01:29, Werner Dittmann wrote: > > All, > > > > based on and strongly influenced by the Phonologies opensource CCXML C++ > > implementation I developed > > a Java based version of the CCXML interpreter. The Java implementation > > currently supports almost all features > > of the C++ version. The Java implementation was done with J2SDK 1.4.2 > and > > uses Apache/Jakarta software, > > such as Junit, log4j, commons httpclient, Xerces as supporting > libraries. > > > > Because I would like to put this work in public domain I appreciate any > > comments which license to use: > > -GPL, BSD, Apache, is there a W3C license for publice domain/opensource > SW? > > > > Any ideas where to place the software as opensource? > > > > Ideas, comments, etc. are appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > Werner > > > > mailto:Werner.Dittmann@t-online.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 19:53:32 UTC