- From: Daniel Burnett <burnett@nuance.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:05:28 -0800
- To: "Susan Lesch" <lesch@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>
Susan, In answer to your question below, we would like to do something like what you suggest in a version beyond SSML 1.0. For this version we will actually be removing all of the examples to avoid confusing about what is being standardized. -- Dan Burnett Synthesis Team Leader, Voice Browser Working Group -----Original Message----- From: Susan Lesch [mailto:lesch@w3.org] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 6:54 PM To: Daniel Burnett Cc: www-voice@w3.org Subject: RE: Comments for SSML 1.0 Last Call Working Draft Daniel Burnett wrote: >If you believe we have not adequately addressed your issues with our >responses, please let us know as soon as possible. If we do not hear >from you within 14 days, we will take this as tacit acceptance. Your edits look fine to me. Thank you. >In the first table in 2.1.4, did you mean to spell out an example for >'telephone'? > >>>> Proposed resolution: N/A >>>> > >>> We do not understand your question. Can you please clarify? Sorry I wasn't clear. The other "number" values show pronunciation: <say-as interpret-as="number" format="ordinal">5</say-as> : fifth I just wondered if you meant to do that for telephone as well: <say-as interpret-as="number" format="telephone">123-456-7890</say-as> > >>> We would also like to point out that the examples in >>>> this section are expected to be removed altogether in > >>> the next draft. Best wishes, -- Susan Lesch http://www.w3.org/People/Lesch/ mailto:lesch@w3.org tel:+1.858.483.4819 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 17:05:36 UTC