- From: Daniel Burnett <burnett@nuance.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:05:28 -0800
- To: "Susan Lesch" <lesch@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>
Susan,
In answer to your question below, we would like to do something like what you suggest in a version beyond SSML 1.0. For this version we will actually be removing all of the examples to avoid confusing about what is being standardized.
-- Dan Burnett
Synthesis Team Leader, Voice Browser Working Group
-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Lesch [mailto:lesch@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 6:54 PM
To: Daniel Burnett
Cc: www-voice@w3.org
Subject: RE: Comments for SSML 1.0 Last Call Working Draft
Daniel Burnett wrote:
>If you believe we have not adequately addressed your issues with our
>responses, please let us know as soon as possible. If we do not hear
>from you within 14 days, we will take this as tacit acceptance.
Your edits look fine to me. Thank you.
>In the first table in 2.1.4, did you mean to spell out an example for
>'telephone'?
>
>>>> Proposed resolution: N/A
>>>>
> >>> We do not understand your question. Can you please clarify?
Sorry I wasn't clear. The other "number" values show pronunciation:
<say-as interpret-as="number" format="ordinal">5</say-as> : fifth
I just wondered if you meant to do that for telephone as well:
<say-as interpret-as="number"
format="telephone">123-456-7890</say-as>
> >>> We would also like to point out that the examples in
>>>> this section are expected to be removed altogether in
> >>> the next draft.
Best wishes,
--
Susan Lesch http://www.w3.org/People/Lesch/
mailto:lesch@w3.org tel:+1.858.483.4819
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 17:05:36 UTC