VoiceXML 2.0: Official Response #11 to Candidate Recommendation Issues

The Voice Browser Working Group (VBWG) is now completing its resolution
of 
issues raised during the review of the Candidate Recommendation version
of
VoiceXML 2.0 [1]. Our apologies that it has taken so long to respond.

Following the process described in [2] for advancement to Proposed
Recommendation, this is the VBWG's formal response to the issues you
raised.

Please indicate before 26 November 2003 whether you are satisfied with
the
VBWG's resolutions, whether you think there has been a misunderstanding,
or
whether you wish to register an objection.

If you do not think you can respond before 26 November, please let me
know.
The Director will appreciate a response whether you agree with the
resolutions
or not. However, if we do not hear from you at all by 26 November 2003,
we
will assume that you accept our resolutions.

Below you will find a summary of the VBWG's responses to each of your
issues. Please use the issue identifiers when responding.

Thank you,

Scott McGlashan
Co-chair, Voice Browser Working Group

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-voicexml20-20030220/ 
[2] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/ 


-----------------------------------------------
Issues you raised and VBWG responses
-----------------------------------------------

Issues: CR17-1
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2003JulSep/0001.html

Issue CR17-1
In all revs of the VXML 2.0 spec, Appendix J (Changes from VoiceXML
1.0),
"Modified Elements" section, it says:
	added "error.unsupported.language" pre-defined error type
(5.3.6) 

However, the reference to section 5.3.6 points to "REPROMPT", which
doesn't
have this error listed, and I don't understand any scenarios where
REPROMPT
could throw this event.

We are working on a project porting a product from VXML 1.0 to 2.0, and
if
this change actually does impact the REPROMPT element, we need to
understand
it better.

Alternately, is it possible that this is a typo in the spec, and that
instead
of "5.3.6", it should really refer to section "5.2.6" - "Event Types"
which
would make complete sense?

CR17-1 Resolution: accepted 

It is a typo and will be corrected to 5.2.6.

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 14:33:30 UTC