RE: Comments for WD-speech-grammar-20010820

Susan,

Thank you for the detailed review of the speech recognition grammar
specification.  All of the changes you proposed have been applied to 
the latest revision.

  http://www.w3.org/Voice/Group/2002/grammar/grammar-spec-20020304.html
  [W3C Members Only]

Please let us know within 2 weeks whether your comments were
satisfactorily addressed.

In preparing this disposition email I found that the WG had not 
addressed your comments on the Jan 2001 Last Call:
  [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2001JanMar/0005.html

Fortunately we had dealt with most, but not all, of your comments.
I will respond separately to those issues.

--Andrew Hunt
  SpeechWorks


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Susan Lesch
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:33 AM
> To: www-voice@w3.org
> Subject: Comments for WD-speech-grammar-20010820
> 
> 
> Here are just a few additional comments for your speech grammar Last
> Call Working Draft [1]. The comments [2] that I sent you for the last
> Last Call Working Draft have not been addressed yet and still stand.
> Sorry for any overlap. If I can be of assistance getting them all
> incorporated into your next publication, please let me know.
> 
> Globally, white-space and whitespace -> white space (if you want to
> follow XML 1.0, see http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-white-space).
> 
> Globally, working draft -> Working Draft and working group -> Working
> Group to match the W3C Process document
> (see http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/)
> 
> Globally, Media type -> media type
> 
> Below, a section number is followed by a quote and then a suggestion.
> 
> Abstract
> representating
> representing
> 
> 2.1
> aka
> a.k.a.
> 
> 2.2.2
> http header
> HTTP header
> 
> specifes
> specifies
> 
> 2.3
> The comment in the final XML example should be marked up
> <!-- --> not //
> 
> 2.4.1
> Please move references to an informative references section.
> 
> 2.5
> Although it both ABNF and XML support
> Although both ABNF and XML support
> 
> In 2.7, this sentence is irregular:
>    In situations where applications target a multilingual user
>    community it may be needed for grammars contain words in different
>    languages.
> could read:
>    In situations where applications target a multilingual user
>    community, grammars that contain words in different languages
>    may be needed.
> 
> 2.7
> Multiple language
> Multiple languages
> 
> 3.1 and 4.1
> semi-colon
> semicolon
> 
> 3.2
> referencable
> referenceable (or reword)
> 
> 4.1.3
> a alias reference
> an alias reference
> 
> 4.1.5
> tag-format declaration
> tag format declaration
> 
> 4.2
> http header
> HTTP header
> 
> 4.2 (twice) and 4.3
> preceed
> precede
> 
> F.
> XML Form grammar to the Augmented BNF Form
> XML form grammar to the augmented BNF form
> (or change "forms" in Appendix G)
> 
> H.
> Please move the reference to a references section.
> 
> concatention (twice)
> concatenation
> 
> Speech Recognition Grammar Format
> Speech Recognition Grammar format
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-speech-grammar-20010820/
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2001JanMar/0005.html
> 
> Best wishes for your project,
> -- 
> Susan Lesch - mailto:lesch@w3.org  tel:+1.858.483.4819
> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) - http://www.w3.org
>

Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 11:24:53 UTC