- From: James Salsman <j.salsman@bovik.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:50:07 -0800 (PST)
- To: scott.mcglashan@pipebeach.com
- Cc: www-voice@w3.org
Scott, Thank you for your invitation: > Due to W3C member confidentially, I cannot go into the details of > specific technical decisions or even specific features which are being > considered for future versions (until that information is made public by > the group). If you are seriously interested in that level of technical > discussion I would encourage you to join the Voice Browser Group --- see > http://www.w3.org for membership details. This will give you access to > our internal discussions and decision-making process. > > Please let me know if this reply is unsatisfactory, or you want further > information. Yes, I find it unsatisfactory that the W3C still lacks the transparency required by most interpretations of the scientific method. Therefore I must respectfully decline your invitation. I would like further information about the following: Does general EVAL functionality exist in VoiceXML, and if not, what proposals have been made to establish it? Best wishes, James Salsman
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 17:50:12 UTC