- From: <franl@centerline.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 94 12:53:22 -0500
- To: www-vlib@www0.cern.ch
> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 1994 17:26:20 +0100 > From: secret@www5.cern.ch (Arthur Secret) > I don't mind wether we use a stat file, or comments inside the file. > This isn't an issue for me: both solutions are easy to implement in perl. I vote for a separate file that is either all HTML comments or sent with a "Content-type: text/plain" HTTP header. If it's a file of HTML comments, the comment delimiters should be immediately stripped before any further processing takes place (think of them as a transport layer in a packet-switched network). The file format should be extensible. The first line should indicate the revision of the file format using an RFC822-style header: Version: 1.0 followed by a blank line and then the stats data. We should start with a very general format and doesn't have much granularity in the stats data. Over time we can introduce more granularity and bump the version number. No need to work it all out in advance -- that only leads to analysis paralysis. Comments? -- Fran Litterio franl@centerline.com (617-498-3255) CenterLine Software http://draco.centerline.com:8080/~franl/ Cambridge, MA, USA 02138-1110 PGP public key id: 1270EA1D
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 1994 17:53:02 UTC