W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > October 2022

Re: Ruby RB is no error?

From: Jukka K. Korpela <jukkakk@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 23:04:21 +0300
Message-ID: <CAGHxYa4+-Who393owJ=CFuD2OsB7nDzF2pOD__nbN6Up8N_frg@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-validator@w3.org
 Jens Oliver Meiert (jens@meiert.org) kirjoitti:

> According to

> >
> https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features
> > <rb>, <big>, <tt> are obsolete, non-conforming.
> >
> > But I get errors only for <big> and <tt>, not for <rb>.
>
> This is probably due to https://www.w3.org/TR/ruby/, which specifies this
> element.
>

But why would a W3C recommendation that is over 20 years old affect
validation against “living HTML”?
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2022 20:04:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 4 October 2022 20:04:48 UTC