Re: Nu Html Checker

THANK YOU PHAEWRYN!!!

Seriously- Eric Richards should be banned from this list for that terribly
insensitive, insulting, ableist remark.  I am disabled and I was shocked
that I even saw that remark on this list.  There are plenty of other places
to display that kind of nasty behavior.  We don't need it here.

--Anna Marie
(First name = "Anna Marie")

Anna Marie Golden, IT Accessibility Specialist
University of Washington


On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:45 AM, O'Guin, Phaewryn <JDO09280@ccv.vsc.edu>
wrote:

> “I was not looking for a handicap unemployable comedian to make a reply on
> this forum.”
>
>
>
> Well, we’re not looking for tireless trolls on this forum, but yet you
> seem to never cease to crawl out from under your bridge to proselytize and
> insult people. It’s amazing really, how a troll as cumbersome as yourself
> can haul his onerous deadweight up onto a soapbox and not have it collapse
> under the combined weight of the burdensome disposition and the cross
> you’re constantly bearing.
>
>
>
> I was thinking more of “Yes we have or we are working on a robot
> validator, robots can send us a URL and they get back a automatic ranking
> as to how high they should rank the URL on their search list.” So the
> answer is simple you want bigger sales take the effort to make sure your
> website validates.
>
>
>
> It’s not the job of the W3C to dictate how search engines rank websites.
> Perhaps Google or Yahoo has an email list you can go troll for a while? So
> far as the matter goes, the issue at hand is self-regulating: In the
> example you give, the burden of a website which some potential clients
> cannot access will in itself reduce the company’s sales due to reduced
> outreach – it is not necessary for an outside force to police the matter,
> their own negligence will reduce their sales by limiting their audience.
> It’s also not the entire internet’s problem that you refuse to use the best
> access method for accessing the internet.
>
>
>
> I revel in informing you that the world does not, in fact, revolve around
> Eric Richards, and no one, literally, NO ONE is going to change the way
> they are doing things to make you happier, you sad, pathetic, angry man. No
> one cares about you or puts any value on your tirades. I’d say you are
> laughable, but for the fact that you’re so pathetic it almost feels like
> beating a man when he’s down, like insulting a disabled person.
>
>
>
> The fact is, it is not as case of use the wrong tool to do a job, but the
> proof I have found if a URL passes the validator then it displays without
> any problems on cell phones.
>
>
>
> It’s not the job of the W3C to police the internet. Website designers who
> are conscientious will exert the effort to make their webpages accessible
> for all, but this is an elective process. No one is forcing people to be
> conscientious, or even competent. The W3C does, however, have the power to
> police it’s email list, enforcing, if not conscientiousness, at least
> civility.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Phaewryn (J.D.) O’Guin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Eric Richards <2eric.richards@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2018 8:23 PM - 20:23 PM
> *To:* www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Nu Html Checker
>
>
>
> Thank you Philip
>
> I was not looking for a handicap unemployable comedian to make a reply on
> this forum.
>
> I was thinking more of “Yes we have or we are working on a robot
> validator, robots can send us a URL and they get back a automatic ranking
> as to how high they should rank the URL on their search list.” So the
> answer is simple you want bigger sales take the effort to make sure your
> website validates.
>
> The fact is, it is not as case of use the wrong tool to do a job, but the
> proof I have found if a URL passes the validator then it displays without
> any problems on cell phones.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Philip Taylor (RHUoL) <
> P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Eric Richards wrote:
>
>
>
> So What has been done to fix up internet so my old cell phone can read ALL
> websites, ...
>
>
> Eric, I think you are confused.  Cell 'phones are for making and receiving
> telephone calls; computers are for reading web sites (amongst other
> things).  If your cell 'phone cannot display something, try your computer
> -- you would not (I think) complain if your hammer was not very good at
> driving screws, so why not adopt the same philosophy for telephones ?
>
> Philip Taylor
>
>