- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:56:42 +0100
- To: Jacques Mattheij <jacques@mattheij.com>
- Cc: "www-validator@w3.org" <www-validator@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vnmu8yA53Eg4-Noi8wfwVCmHtzvkVnRKsCkbbrAR7Robw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jacques, >http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xhtml-role-20071004/ the document you cite is a working draft from 2007. It has no standing, it also predates the formulation of conformance rules for use of ARIA in HTML. <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xhtml-role-20071004/> The HTML5 recommendation (Oct 2014) requirement for ul/ol elements If specified, role must be one of the following: directory, group, list, > listbox, menu, menubar, radiogroup, tablist, toolbar, tree or presentation > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/dom.html#sec-implicit-aria-semantics > Since HTML5 was published, the rules for use of ARIA in HTML have been split out of the HTML spec. The latest version of the requirements can be found here: http://www.w3.org/TR/html-aria/ If you find any further errors/warnings about ARIA use on HTML elements, which you think are questionable, check the ARIA in HTML specification as this is what the W3C conformance checker implements. -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> On 22 July 2015 at 11:56, Jacques Mattheij <jacques@mattheij.com> wrote: > Hello there, > > When I run http://jacquesmattheij.com/ through your verifier I get this > error: > > *Error*: Bad value navigation for attribute role on element ul > <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/single-page.html#the-ul-element> > . > > But when I check how that's supposed to be done on the w3 site > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xhtml-role-20071004/ > > That is explicitly used as an example: > > <ul role="navigation wai:sitemap"> > <li href="downloads">Downloads</li> > <li href="docs">Documentation</li> > <li href="news">News</li> > </ul> > > It states that sample is only 'informative', but still if that's not good > use then I would expect them to use another example. Please let me know > which of the two (verifier or standards document) is in error. > > best regards, > > Jacques Mattheij > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2015 12:57:51 UTC