- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:57:34 +0900
- To: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Cc: Holger Burghardt <Holger.Burghardt@gmx.net>, www-validator@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20140414235733.GB19653@jay.w3.org>
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>, 2014-04-14 20:42 +0300: ... > The page contains e.g. > > <meta name="DC.Title" lang="fr" content=" .: Une Cerise au potager - > élevage de lapins angoras en Alsace:. " /> > > The name DC.title is *not* registered or even mentioned at > http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions > Instead, dcterms.title is, with a reference to > "Expressing Dublin Core metadata using HTML/XHTML meta and link elements", > http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-html/ > which in turn mentions DC.title but not dcterms.title. See also http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/ It seems maybe dc.title and dcterms.title might both be acceptable. But I can't really tell, given how imprecisely those docs are written. > If there's a mistake here, it has been in the process of defining DC > things in the wiki, rather than in implementing the wiki table in > validators. > > I guess you could register DC.title (and similar names) in the wiki, > with reference to the cited document. Yeah, that'd be the thing to do if the goal is to have them recognized by the validator. > I don't see why that would be > useful, since Dublin Core metadata seems to be just write-only code > on web pages, Agreed, yeah. I don't see many indications that there are a lot of applications out there consuming this dc markup in any form. --Mike > but it would solve this technical problem, in due > time. -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Monday, 14 April 2014 23:57:39 UTC