- From: Jaime Iniesta <jaimeiniesta@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 23:09:17 +0100
- To: "www-validator@w3.org" <www-validator@w3.org>
That's it, Mark. The page I'm trying to validate uses this doctype, that takes a lot of time to download: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-2.dtd I installed the validator following the instructions on http://validator.w3.org/docs/install.html#install-download -- the DTD library that can be downloaded from there doesn't include this doctype. http://validator.w3.org/sgml-lib.tar.gz I guess the official validator.w3.org is using a more up-to-date doctype library than the one that can be downloaded, and that's why they're faster? Does anyone know how to get a more up-to-date DTD library, or include this missing doctype in it? Thanks! 2012/11/2 Mark Rogers <mark.rogers@powermapper.com>: > Have you checked it can find a local copy of the DTDs? If it can’t find > them, I think it falls back to downloading DTDs from w3.org (which would > result in validation working, but being very slow) > > > > Best Regards > > Mark Rogers - mark.rogers@powermapper.com > PowerMapper Software Ltd - www.powermapper.com > > Registered in Scotland No 362274 Quartermile 2 Edinburgh EH3 9GL > > > > > > From: Jon Cram [mailto:jon@webignition.net] > Sent: 02 November 2012 08:31 > To: www-validator@w3.org > Subject: Re: Slowness on local install, just with some URLs > > > > I'm seeing the same on a two local installs of the validator. > > On Ubuntu Desktop 12.10, both 64bit (my main machine) and 32 bit (a CI > server), validation takes a long, long time (longer than a minute). On both > machines I can retrieve the page markup with curl very quickly, there's no > network issue. The happens when validating by direct input, so it's not a > problem with retrieving the page markup through the validator. > > On Ubuntu Server 12.04 on a remotely-hosted dedicated server I'm not getting > the issue and the page validates just as quickly as it does at > http://validator.w3.org. > > I tried playing around with the doctype. Only HTML5 documents validate > quickly and this is explained by the fact that HTML5 validation is deferred > to the validator.nu validator and hence does not use the w3c validator. > > With doctypes that the w3c validator handles and even for simple documents > (just an empty head and body wrapped in an html element), validation takes a > very, very long time. > > I have no idea why. But I can at least confirm that I'm seeing similar > issues. > > On 01/11/12 21:39, Jaime Iniesta wrote: > > Hi, I'm having a weird issue with my local installations of the 1.3 > validator. > > > > I'm validating this URL: > > > > http://www.jedermann-gruppe.de/cms/der-verein > > > > If I validate it on http://validator.w3.org it just takes 2 seconds to > respond, but when I do it on my local installation, it takes about a minute. > > > > Other URLs are fine, but all within this site are super slow. It does not > seem a connectivity issue, as I can browse this site fine, ping, etc. > > > > It does not happen on my local installation of validator.nu. > > > > I've tried on 3 different servers, with ubuntu 32 bits and 64 bits, and > different locations (a dedicated server and a pair of virtual boxes on my > machine). > > > > I can't find any error on the Apache logs, is there any other log to check? > Please notice that the validation goes OK, it returns 7 HTML errors, it's > just slow. > > > > Can anyone with a local installation of the validator verify this? > > > > How can I investigate / solve this? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Jaime > >
Received on Saturday, 3 November 2012 22:09:44 UTC