- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:28:49 -0600
- To: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- CC: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>, Fred Marka <fredmarka@hotmail.com>, www-validator@w3.org
If you really want your pages to validate using OGP, you simply need to express the pages using XHTML+RDFa. That's the only W3C Recommended language that includes these attributes. See http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax for details. On 1/9/2011 7:21 AM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) > <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk> wrote: >>> RDFa needed a way to specify the property designated by arbitrary >>> elements. Overloading @name would not have been realistic, since @name >>> already has different meanings on different elements (e.g. as a >>> fragment identifier, as a form submission key). >> Oh, I thought that was addressed/solved by the attribute "scheme"; >> is that not the case ? > Not really. @scheme disambiguates names in meta @name (RDFa > tries to solve the same problem with CURIEs, prefixing, namespacing). > But @scheme cannot distinguish between utterly different meanings of > @name itself: it only applies to one of those meanings. > > -- > Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 10 January 2011 14:29:32 UTC